Check each method's envelope
Rate, depth and temperature are compared with each method's typical and extended operating ranges. Rod pumps and PCPs lose capacity with depth, so their rate limit falls as the pump goes deeper.
Rate the well's conditions
Free gas (from the gas-oil ratio and water cut), sand, oil viscosity (estimated from °API and temperature), well path, reservoir pressure, location and the power or lift gas on hand are each rated good, workable, needs care, poor or outside range.
Score and rank
Each method starts at 100 and loses 6 points for a workable factor, 16 for one that needs care and 30 for a poor one. A factor outside a method's range caps its score at 15. Scores within a few points are flagged as a close call.
Explain the result
The tool says why the best fit wins, what to watch for, and what stops each of the others, so you can check its reasoning against what you know about the well.
Sources
Screening ranges follow published practice: K. E. Brown, "Overview of Artificial Lift Systems", JPT, October 1982; J. D. Clegg, S. M. Bucaram and N. W. Hein, "Recommendations and Comparisons for Selecting Artificial-Lift Methods", JPT, December 1993; and the screening charts lift suppliers publish. Oil viscosity uses the Beggs and Robinson dead-oil correlation.
What a full study adds
- Bubble point and pump intake pressure, which set the real free gas at the pump
- Inflow performance from well tests
- Scale, wax, emulsion, CO₂ and H₂S
- Casing size, dogleg severity and completion limits
- Plunger lift and jet pumps, which this screen only flags
- Capital, power and workover costs
Please note
This is a first screen, not a design or a guarantee. Use it to start a conversation, and confirm any lift decision with a full engineering study.